Search for: "State v. Underwriters at Lloyds London" Results 81 - 100 of 194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2023, 3:08 pm
Underwriters at Lloyd’s London, 327 S.W.3d 118, 126 (Tex. 2010) (“We look at the language of the policy because we presume parties intend what the words of their contract say. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 10:21 am by Goldberg Segalla LLP
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London for the proposition that a follow the fortunes clause does not serve to alter the terms of the contract or create coverage where none exists. [read post]
24 May 2012, 12:09 pm by Goldberg Segalla LLP
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London for the proposition that a follow the fortunes clause does not serve to alter the terms of the contract or create coverage where none exists. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 3:02 pm
”  Thus, the court overruled the objections of the objecting insurers and entered an Order that the assignment of rights in certain insurance policies to the asbestos trust is valid and enforceable, notwithstanding anti-assignment provisions in the policies.Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London and Certain London Market Companies, as well as another group of insurers, appealed to the United States District Court for the… [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 10:36 am by mesothelioma
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London On Wednesday, February 22, 2012, Exxon filed suit at the New York State Supreme Court in Manhattan against several insurance companies, including Lloyd’s of London, to claim reimbursement for the money the oil giant has already spent on legal defense fees, awards and settlements, as well as for the costs of pending litigation and cases that are predicted to be filed in the future. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:06 am by Erin Miller
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London Docket: 09-945 Issue: Whether Chapter 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act is an “Act of Congress” subject to the anti-preemption provision of the McCarran-Ferguson Act. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 1:46 pm by WIMS
Appellees, Aspen Insurance UK Limited, Ace European Group Limited, and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London (collectively Underwriters). [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:19 am
Where the covered risks are spread over multiple states, courts will generally locate the risk in one state, namely, "the state of the insured's domicile at the time the policy was issued," and a "corporate insured's domicile is the state of its principal place of business" (Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v Foster Wheeler Corp., 36 AD3d 17, 24-25 [2006], affd 9 NY3d 928 [2007]). [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 1:40 am
Century then cross-petitioned to compel Argonaut to participate in a single consolidated arbitration of the three claims and sixteen other pending claims.The parties agreed that in accordance with the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit's recent decision in Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 7:34 am by Beth Graham
Finally, on December 13, the Court denied certiorari in Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 4:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. v Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, 176 Misc 2d 605, 611 [Sup Ct, NY County 1998], affd 263 AD2d 367 [1999]; In re Quigley Co., 2009 WL 9034027, *2-3, 2009 Bankr LEXIS 1352, *7-8 [SD NY, Apr. 24, 2009, No. 04-15739 (SMB)]). [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. v Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, 176 Misc 2d 605, 611 [Sup Ct, NY County], affd 263 AD2d 367; In re Quigley Co. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 1:41 am
Co., 21 AD3d 978, 981; Ambrosio v Newburgh Enlarged City School Dist., 5 AD3d 410, 412; Sayed v Macari, 296 AD2d 396, 397; City of New York v Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London, 294 AD2d 391, 391; Structure Tone v Burgess Steel Prods. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 4:38 pm
Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, --- P.3d ----, 2008 WL 943502 (N.M. 2008), the counsel for the plaintiffs, wrongful-death beneficiaries, provided the insurer with a copy of the filings in a related probate proceedings. [read post]