Search for: "State v. W. D."
Results 81 - 100
of 5,014
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
” In support of this very broad proposition, the CRSCC cites In re Griffin, in which Chief Justice Chase, sitting by designation, wrote that the disability “create[d]” by Section 3 is “to be made operative … by the legislation of congress in its ordinary course. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 10:50 am
A short excerpt from today's long decision by Judge Trevor McFadden (D.D.C.) in Newman v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:59 am
Brian D. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:54 pm
Mazer v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm
Graham v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:21 am
” Brief for Julius W. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Thursday in what is shaping up to be the biggest election case since its ruling nearly 25 years ago in Bush v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
We also await the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
In State v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
”[2] In that same policy, the Commission articulated its belief “that a refusal to admit the allegations is equivalent to a denial, unless the defendant or respondent states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
§ 2383, which provides that “[w]hoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto … shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:06 am
” Principle 3, Comment 3(d) (emphasis supplied). [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 8:53 am
Mata v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 8:32 am
Rampart Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm
According to the SEC’s Rule 34-98738, which went into effect on Jan. 2, “[w]hile short selling can serve useful market purposes, such as facilitating price discovery, there are concerns that it could be used to drive down the price of a security, to accelerate a declining market in a security, or to manipulate stock prices. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Board of Regents of University of Colorado (D. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm
Dávila v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 2:40 pm
From Nelson v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
