Search for: "State v. Wax"
Results 81 - 100
of 332
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2015, 2:57 am
Perhaps worse, this standard is stated as being the standard for the Lanham Act in a state law consumer protection case, with citation of but no apparent comprehension of the difference between literal falsity and literal truth that is nonetheless misleading. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 3:59 pm
I'm on board, especially after Judge Kleinfeld waxes poetic about the nature of the offense, about how being "found" in the United States is still voluntary even when you're involuntarily in prison, etc. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 8:35 am
State v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 2:02 pm
I've previously waxed poetic about how the California Supreme Court is really smart, often unanimous, blah blah blah. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 1:35 am
You may have noticed that one of the key issues in yesterday's global warming decision, Massachusetts v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
I also enjoyed reading Margaret Chon's recent book chapter, Certification and Collective Marks in the United States. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 5:35 am
Indeed, as the Wax court stated in a footnote holding hospitals to a non-delegable duty to provide adequate radiology departments, pathology laboratories and emergency rooms "makes sense as an aspiration for the evolution of Florida law. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:55 am
In Vartelas v. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 11:55 am
Half-measures versus the whole ball of wax. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 1:32 pm
The Supreme Court briefing is now complete in Riegel v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:57 am
Mason v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 3:21 pm
Disparate impact was established United States Supreme Court as Ricci v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 11:54 am
You may remember Kelo v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 7:57 am
State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:29 am
Similarly, in Hot Wax, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 1:18 pm
The case is Chanel Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 6:19 am
It allows parents to make all decisions with regard to raising their child without fear of governmental interference as long as those decisions pose no threat to the child’s or the public’s order, safety and welfare. (3) The court’s ruling came in connection with the case of Tortorice v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
V. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 9:57 am
Florida State David A. [read post]
