Search for: "State v. White & Stewart"
Results 81 - 100
of 250
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2015, 10:37 pm
And concluded that what Potter Stewart's "concurring Brothers" demonstrated in 1972 was true. [read post]
20 May 2010, 10:19 am
In the immediate years after the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:19 pm
William Rehnquist (appointed by Nixon) and Byron White (appointed by Kennedy) are the only dissenters. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 10:49 pm
S., at 370 (White, J., dissenting); Rosenbloom v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 2:38 pm
Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972) was a per curiam opinion with all nine justices writing either concurrences (Douglas, Brennan, Stewart, White, Marshall) or dissents (Burger, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist) — and the case effectively halted capital punishment in this country for a significant period of time. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 11:38 am
Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972) was a per curiam opinion with all nine justices writing either concurrences (Douglas, Brennan, Stewart, White, Marshall) or dissents (Burger, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist) --- and the case effectively halted capital punishment in this country for a significant period of time. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 7:40 pm
The low-down from the West Coast: In United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 10:55 am
Stewart v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
Stewart, Vignera v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2025, 1:02 pm
See United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 6:07 pm
Stewart will support the estate on behalf of the federal government, as an amicus. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:14 am
” At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr reports that Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 8:31 am
Stewart (2005) 126 Cal.App.4th 43, 80; Savaglio v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 11:27 pm
"Put another way: Two so called conservatives (Rhenquist and White) three moderates (Burger, Powell and Stewart) and one liberal (Stevens) had absolutely no problem signing an opinion asserting the State's right to regulate the fetus in compliance with State mandated population and demographic growth concerns. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 11:01 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Raymond Stewart v. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 8:00 am
A second approach would have been to categorically exempt minor accomplices swept up in the felony murder rule, a position adopted by Justice White in this case and later by the Court in Enmund v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:55 am
s 1954 ruling that struck down state laws establishing separate schools for black and white children. [read post]
29 May 2015, 5:57 am
As this news story notes, both the federal government and the State of Indiana have charged Bradbury for the comments in his Facebook post. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
The White House has denied reports that it rejected a request for a meeting. [read post]
