Search for: "State v. Winston"
Results 81 - 100
of 377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2021, 9:50 am
But the prior owners of the VLSI v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 3:00 am
The Winston-Salem Journal has the story here. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 12:42 pm
Thus, under United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 12:42 pm
Thus, under United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 3:19 am
Here’s what the court wrote: Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that the LLC’s records, which included the LLC’s tax returns for the years 1999 and 2000, established that Winston Chiu’s initial membership interest was 25% (see Reichman v Reichman, 88 AD3d 680, 682; Man Choi Chiu v Chiu, 38 AD3d 619, 621; Matter Capizola v Vantage Intl., 2 AD3d 843, 844). [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 5:25 am
Winston v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 9:28 am
See English v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 3:28 am
See English v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 4:17 am
They were set forth in bullet fashion in the opinion: “The allegation that, while representing plaintiff in the assignment-of-lease negotiations, counsel secretly represented the counterparty so as to obtain favorable terms for the counterparty, which resulted in a lower-than-market price for the assignment, states a claim for legal malpractice (see Leggiadro, Ltd. v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 119 AD3d 442 [1st Dept 2014]). [read post]
19 May 2007, 1:46 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 7:55 am
The court used the factors found in Winston v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 10:45 am
Keith Eric Wood The State of Michigan Court of Appeals issued an opinion in People v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 2:33 am
Caglayan Orge Saylan v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 2:35 am
In light of the issues presented by United States v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 6:45 pm
The reasoning: Where a sophisticated client imposes a strategic decision on counsel, the client’s action absolves the attorney from liability for malpractice (Town of North Hempstead v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 28 AD3d 746 [2006]; Stolmeier v Fields, 280 AD2d 342 [2001]). [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 11:37 am
See, e.g., Winston v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 8:08 am
Winston, guest bloggerThe Supreme Court of the United States has ruled in United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:36 pm
Schaerr of Winston & Strawn LLP, Prof. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 2:59 am
No doubt, BPI's counsel, Winston & Strawn, Chicago's oldest law firm took every word of that 1995 9th Circuit opinion into account when it was writing BPI's lengthy complaint filed against ABC News in South Dakota state court Thursday. [read post]
