Search for: "State v. Z. A. B." Results 81 - 100 of 418
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2020, 12:46 pm by Giles Peaker
Mrs Nur does not work because of her caring responsibilities for Z and is therefore in receipt of state welfare benefits. [read post]
12 Dec 2020, 9:07 am
Foreign Direct Investment, the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, and Individual Corruption Experiences in Africa Christopher Heurlin, Authoritarian Aid and Regime Durability: Soviet Aid to the Developing World and Donor–Recipient Institutional Complementarity and Capacity Simone Dietrich, Helen V Milner, & Jonathan B Slapin, From Text to Political Positions on Foreign Aid: Analysis of Aid Mentions in Party Manifestos from 1960 to 2015 Laura Seelkopf & Ida Bastiaens,… [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 12:51 pm by Giles Peaker
Z & Anor, R (on the application of) v Hackney London Borough Council & Anor (Rev 1) (2020) UKSC 40 The issue of the application of the Equality Act to local authority nomination agreements with housing charities reached the Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:49 am
 Z) This County Court Judge Placed a Defendant in Pre-trial diversion over the objection of the State. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
El último presidente demócrata en haber nominado a un juez a la Corte Suprema había sido Lyndon B. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am by INFORRM
United States On 24 August Reuters had an article “Sarah Palin can sue New York Times for defamation – court ruling”. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 7:39 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
Consumer information publications issued under Regulation X and Regulation Z All FCRA disclosure notices Approval under Regulation B of the final redesigned Uniform Residential Loan Application EFTA preemption determinations Concurrences with the federal banking agencies regarding real estate appraisals With regard to ratification of other actions, the Bureau states: The Bureau is considering whether ratifications of certain other legally significant actions by the… [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 9:01 am by Giles Peaker
Following A Ltd v Z (2019) UKEAT 0273_18_2803, it was for the landlords to show that it was unreasonable for them to be expected to know that Ms P suffered an impediment to her physical or mental health and that it had a substantial and long term effect. [read post]