Search for: "Steven Amaral"
Results 81 - 100
of 122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
For example, Amar approved of the Dobbs opinion even before it was officially released. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
Finally, most books included the leading cases from the Roberts Court: Snyder, Stevens, and EMA. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
Stevens Professor of Law at Cornell University [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 12:01 am
’ Yale Law School professor Akhil Reed Amar offers this assessment of Bingham’s contribution: ‘It was Bingham’s generation that in effect added a closing parenthesis after the first eight . . . amendments, distinguishing these amendments from all others. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 1:54 am
By my count, there were three: Sandy Levinson, Larry Tribe, and Akhil Amar. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 12:54 pm
TWith regard to "constitutional criminal proceure," I think it's accurate to suggest that only Akhil Reed Amar, among "major constitutional theorists," has written extensively about the subject; his views are typically interesting and idiosyncratic. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 12:53 pm
Previous recipients include philanthropists Michael Bloomberg, Bill Gates, and Mark Getty; former Chairmen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Joseph Dunford and Martin Dempsey; and the filmmaker Steven Spielberg. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 2:02 pm
My good friend and casebook co-editor Akhil Amar will no doubt remind me that secession is "unconstitutional. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
Mitu Gulati (Duke University); Ariel Porat (University of Tel Aviv); Gerhard Wagner (University of Bonn) Cincinnati: Kathleen Bergin (South Texas) (Spring 2011) Columbia: Akhil Amar (Yale) (Fall 2010); William Eskridge, Jr. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
In issuing this ruling, however, Justice Stevens noted that Ms. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 6:14 am
The Federalist Society has celebrated the work of the late justice Antonin Scalia, whose legacy was the focus of last year’s annual convention, while also praising the academic work of liberal scholars such as Akhil Reed Amar, who was awarded the Society’s Paul M. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 9:16 am
Settlement As was pointed out in an article of EIP Amar, ‘many of the parties involved in (…) initial infringement actions are pairings familiar from litigation already being fought in UK, Germany or US, such as Edwards Life Sciences against Meril, Ocado against Autostore and Amgen against Sanofi / Regeneron’. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 11:21 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and a long line of renowned scholars across the ideological spectrum – including Akhil Amar, Steven Calabresi and others – have recognized that “[e]ver since the 19th amendment, women are citizens of equal stature with men. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am
In Justia’s Verdict blog, Vikram Amar also discusses Manuel, observing that “once we say (as we have) that the Fourth Amendment protects not only against a wrongful initial arrest, but also the time between arrest and indictment, it is not at all clear why an indictment would cause its protection to vanish. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:37 pm
Stevens, Comment, Baseball’s DNA testing policy strikes out: genetic discrimination in Major League Baseball, 412 SETON HALL LAW REVIEW 813 (2011) Kelly M. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:49 pm
Lootawan, Stacy Manbahaul, Steven A. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Stevens Professor of Law at Cornell University Law School and the principal author of The Oxford Introductions to U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
As Professor Amar explained, the appeals court opinion makes sense as an application of the Hunter/Seattle principle. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
Yet, Professor Akhil Amar has observed that by the time of Reconstruction, the term had come to encompass an individual right. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
Accordingly, we can separate the plausible scenarios from the hot air.The Challenge Is PreposterousRegular Verdict readers will have learned from an outstanding four-part series by Vikram Amar, Evan Caminker, and Jason Mazzone that the challenge to the ACA the Court hears today rests on a truly preposterous chain of reasoning.In 2010, Congress enacted the ACA, a complex law with some interrelated and many unrelated parts. [read post]
