Search for: "Stevens v. Blake"
Results 81 - 91
of 91
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2007, 7:04 am
"In all material respects, California's DSL resembles the sentencing systems invalidated" in Blakely v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 7:47 am
It seems clear that Justice Kennedy still wants the Apprendi-Blakely rule watered down and that Justice Stevens likes the Apprendi-Blakely rule livened up. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 1:32 pm
New Jersey lawyer Steven Sanders, who has long been thoughtfully examining the issue of how to deal with Blakely errors, sent me this thoughtful comment about Justice Scalia's curious work yesterday in his dissent in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 7:29 am
Here is Lyle's early report:[T]he Court declined to rule on the question of whether the sentencing decision in Blakely v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 7:03 am
In a second decision, the Court declined to rule on the question of whether the sentencing decision in Blakely v. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 3:56 am
Steven L. [read post]
12 Oct 2006, 7:50 am
Though much can be said about the substance of the arguments--particularly Cunningham v. [read post]
13 Aug 2006, 2:24 pm
(Merck KGaA v. [read post]
28 Jun 2006, 8:22 am
Justice Kennedy concurred and Justices Stevens and Ginsburg dissented.Filed in: cases, SupremeCourt, Washington-v-Recuenco, Blakely-v-Washington, sentencing, , firearms-enhancement [read post]
13 Oct 2005, 7:06 pm
And we had Justice Souter writing Jones, Justice Stevens writing Apprendi and Booker, Justice Ginsburg writing Ring, and Justice Scalia writing Blakely. [read post]
16 Jan 2005, 9:12 pm
[*Judge Cassell gave us Croxford immediately after Blakely and has now given us US v. [read post]
