Search for: "Still v. Lance" Results 81 - 100 of 164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2019, 7:55 am
That Bunker still stands today and you can visit it. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark's new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION - the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: KINDER vs… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark's new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION - the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: KINDER vs… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
(IP Dragon)   Denmark Denmark’s new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance)   Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION – the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV… [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 7:37 am
’” Id. at *4 (quoting Sanchez-Robles, 927 F.2d at 1074; quoting United States v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 10:20 am by Bexis
Hoffman La Roche, Inc., 618 N.W.2d 827, 840 (Neb. 2000); Lance v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
  Beyond that, Yates-based preemption would erase the non-generic stop-selling claim allowed in Pennsylvania in Lance (2014 -2). [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 5:30 am by Don Cruse
LANCE MORRIS, No. 09-0495 Per Curiam The Court presented this as an application of its recent decision in TEXAS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm by Bexis
  Still, Caronia’s holding, even in the purely criminal context, that the First Amendment protects truthful promotion of off-label uses, is significant enough to make our top ten. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 8:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The employee filed a human rights complaint in Wood v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:40 am by Rick St. Hilaire
Attorney Preet Bharara brought the seizure and forfeiture action of United States Of America v. [read post]