Search for: "Strange v. Doe"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,025
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2023, 8:19 am
"] From C.M. v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:07 am
Relying principally on Sternberg v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 9:58 am
From yesterday's unanimous opinion, Twitter v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 12:56 pm
The Fourth Circuit found a stop justified in Walker v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 12:30 pm
ShareThursday’s decision in Financial Oversight & Management Board for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 12:30 pm
ShareThursday’s decision in Financial Oversight & Management Board for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
6 May 2023, 2:49 pm
” There seems to be only one relevant precedent: Televest v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 3:30 am
Doron Dorfman The law has a strange relationship with gay sex. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 6:08 am
Southey Doctor V. 165 A story strange I will you tell..Of a woman that danced upon the rope, And so did her husband too: With a dildo, dildo, dildo, With a dildo, dildo, dee.For the "object shaped like an erect penis," the oldest quote is from 1597, and the best quote is:a1631 J. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:28 pm
In the process, Gorsuch does this strange performance. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 6:36 pm
Concerning private pacts, Biskupic does a flashback to NFIB v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 8:28 am
Hill v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 6:36 am
From C.M. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
Litigation makes strange bedfellows, especially litigation about bedfellows. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 7:05 am
After the Supreme Court decided California v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
Doe, involving whether a state court clerk was properly denied quasi-judicial immunity for telling a pregnant minor, Jane Doe, that her parents would be informed if she tried to obtain a judicial bypass to get an abortion without parental consent. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 8:19 am
Invoking Strang v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
But does the State affirmatively have to allege and prove a lack of consent? [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:59 am
” That’s more than a little strange, and bear in mind that “[t]he Board, being thoroughly familiar with current case law, will apply the correct case law,” In re Active Ankle Sys., Inc., 83 U.S.P.Q.2d 1532, 1534 (T.T.A.B. 2007), and that before issuing a precedential decision such as Uman, “[t]he Board engages in thorough internal review,” DC Comics v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
In Pelech v Pelech, [1984] CanLII 629 (BC SC), Mrs. [read post]
