Search for: "Strickland v. People"
Results 81 - 100
of 264
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
Kulbicki, a case on last week’s Conference at which the Court has been asked to review whether a court violates Strickland v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:04 pm
Some people think that too many people are on vacation in August. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am
New York’s Board of Education has got to be hoping the Court doesn’t do social promotion, because four repeats is usually enough for most people just to give in. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:11 pm
At sentencing, counsel filed a motion under People v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
Cronic to cover counsel's brief absence from trial was an “extreme malfunction” entitling the petitioner to habeas relief; and (2) whether the Michigan courts reasonably determined that Donald had not shown Strickland v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am
Cronic to cover counsel’s brief absence from trial was an “extreme malfunction” entitling the petitioner to habeas relief; and (2) whether the Michigan courts reasonably determined that Donald had not shown Strickland v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm
United States, 14-361, the peculiar case that asks whether a Hobbs Act conspiracy to commit extortion requires that the conspirators agree to obtain property from someone outside the conspiracy, or whether it’s enough to conspire with the people whose money they’re taking. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
Cronic to cover counsel's brief absence from trial was an “extreme malfunction” entitling the petitioner to habeas relief; and (2) whether the Michigan courts reasonably determined that Donald had not shown Strickland v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:19 am
Cronic to cover counsel's brief absence from trial was an “extreme malfunction” entitling the petitioner to habeas relief; and (2) whether the Michigan courts reasonably determined that Donald had not shown Strickland v. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 1:07 pm
In State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:32 am
The SCOV instead concludes that the second standard used by the PRC court, the Strickland standard, is applicable.The Strickland standard (from the SCOTUS decision in Strickland v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 6:33 am
Strickland v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 2:21 pm
Washington Square v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 6:22 am
See Strickland v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 7:28 pm
(Gersten v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
Chatman, 13-8725, which asked whether Georgia’s Supreme Court improperly revisited the performance prong of Strickland v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:36 pm
Under Strickland v. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 3:12 pm
The Judge cited Zhang v. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 3:09 pm
Teague (1989) and People v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 2:59 pm
Padilla held that the defendant's claim was subject to the two-prong ineffective assistance of counsel test in Strickland v. [read post]
