Search for: "Strong v. General Electric Company"
Results 81 - 100
of 234
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2016, 7:40 am
Even if that is not what the Ethics Council is suggesting, the facts here make a strong case for the application of the mitigation obligations under the corporate responsibility to respect--and the duty of an investor to determine the suitability of investment based on an assessment of the enterprise's willingness to shoulder that responsibility, something that the Ethics Council suggested most strongly that these companies failed to do. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:30 pm
The District Court found that argument unavailing: California is attempting to stop leakage of GHG emissions by treating electricity generate outside of the state differently than electricity generated inside its border. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 6:42 am
These are presented as sophisticated, knowledgeable declarants from different companies. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 6:40 pm
” This object number as various blocks pre-allocated to identify the selling-company, product reference, and serial number as shown below. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
Drawn in by their strong sense of smell to the odors around homes, these bears explore for opportunities. [read post]
20 May 2009, 1:30 pm
Allowance allocation- Coal related: 30% to local electric distribution companies regulated by the states. 5% to merchant coal generators. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:19 am
General human motion is not patentable. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Current proposals include: (i) imposing a mandatory “cooling-off” period of 120 days for officers and directors, and 30 days generally, between when a plan is adopted or modified and when trading can commence; (ii) requiring directors and officers to personally certify to the company that they are not in possession of material nonpublic information at the time of adoption or modification of a plan; (iii) providing that the affirmative defense under Rule… [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:19 am
The companies were both Kazakhstan companies and the concession agreement was governed by Kazakhstan law. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:48 am
The companies were both Kazakhstan companies and the concession agreement was governed by Kazakhstan law. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:58 pm
Credit Suisse Securities v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 2:26 pm
Inst. of Technology, 129 F.3d 681(1st Cir. 1997); Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 1:11 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama in Bryant, et al. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 4:02 pm
On June 20, 2011, the high court issued an 8-0 opinion (with Justice Sonia Sotomayor recused) in the case of American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:12 am
Evolution of execution methods and Baze v. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 2:20 pm
On Monday, April 16, the Court will hear argument in Powerex Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:52 am
Rural Electric Convenience Cooperative, Inc. (7th Cir. 1988). [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 9:30 am
In this guest post he provides his observations of the damages testimony in VLSI Technologies v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 11:02 am
That said, I also see serious issues in Huawei v. [read post]
18 May 2017, 12:07 am
Consequently, in Testel Australia Pty Ltd v Krg Electrics the court was able to rely on Testel’s franchise agreement and its trade mark registration in finding that an ex-franchisee had, among other things: engaged in a substantially similar electrical testing business to that of Testel; had used confidential information; and had used and applied Testel’s mark in connection with electrical testing. [read post]
