Search for: "Strong v. Strong"
Results 81 - 100
of 22,304
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm
The behavioral economics field gives us principles that suggest the loss of social security benefits will yield strong emotional and/or litigious responses, with the potential for carry-over into the private pension sphere.[7] To summarize why this is likely to occur: (1) individuals—using the status quo as their reference point—tend to view change as either a gain or a loss from the status quo; (2) “[s]ince losses loom larger [people feel them more… [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:47 pm
Certiorari was not granted in McClinton v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:19 pm
Judge Thompson's reasoning is strong. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:01 am
Elrod v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 4:45 am
New trialR. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:57 am
., R. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:43 am
IOEngine, LLC v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
See James v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:25 am
The Miranda warning originated from the case of Miranda v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:01 am
In Doe v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 12:05 pm
And here's an excerpt from my response to Graham: Graham is wrong to analogize legacy preferences to "preferences for students with strong athletic or artistic abilities. [read post]
5 May 2024, 10:26 am
The briefing cites to Naterra International, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 4:05 pm
Co. of Philadelphia v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:49 am
HR6090, which passed the House of Representatives Wednesday by a 320-91 vote, would provide, in relevant part, For purposes of this Act, the term "definition of antisemitism"— (1) means the definition of antisemitism adopted on May 26, 2016, by the IHRA [International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance], of which the United States is a member, which definition has been adopted by the Department of State; and (2) includes the "[c]ontemporary examples of antisemitism"… [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
See James v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 4:00 am
For example, the famous 1976 California Supreme Court case of Tarasoff v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 2:00 am
Wayland v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:03 pm
Justice Corrigan authors a powerful opinion that holds that it's not permissible for the police to conduct a Terry stop just because someone's in a high crime area and pretending to tie his shoe behind a car in order to avoid the police, and Justice Evan authors an equally powerful concurrence (joined by a majority of the Court) that highlights the racial implications of a rule that assumes that the "normal" response to a police encounter is to welcome and/or consent to… [read post]
