Search for: "Sullivan v. Department of Corrections"
Results 81 - 100
of 149
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2010, 11:45 pm
It is entitled to have regard to them in assessing needs (R v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 5:42 am
For an interesting recent case dealing with this question, see AFDI v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 7:30 am
Once the award came out, Senator Dan Sullivan argued, “In the coming weeks the U.S. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
IPSO 18075-23 Singh v The Sunday Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18301-23 Taylor v The Herald on Sunday, 1 Accuracy 2021, Breach – sanction: publication of correction 19677-23 A complainant v The Daily Telegraph, 3 Harassment (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 19741-23 Dikme v eveningnews24.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction:… [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm
Research and Resources “Institutional Actors in New York Times v Sullivan”, Paul Horwitz, Georgia Law Review, Forthcoming. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 11:59 am
” In United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 7:27 pm
Sullivan, a U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm
While both Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Neil Gorsuch have criticized Sullivan and called for it to be overruled, it seems unlikely that the court will grant review; just last term, the court relied on Sullivan in holding that threats could not be prosecuted under the First Amendment absent proof they were made in reckless disregard that the listener would be placed in fear. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 8:48 am
Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz, L.L.P., New York (Nicole A. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court resolved this landmark case in 1964, New York Times v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 11:30 am
During the past four terms, the Roberts Court has heard about 10 cases from the state courts per term, reversing on average 84% of the cases it has reviewed.Last term on direct review, the Supreme Court decided just eight cases from the state courts (plus one case, Sullivan v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 12:16 am
In many if not most instances, that would be correct. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am
Circuit stayed a decision by Judge Emmet Sullivan of the U.S. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:22 am
Murphy, Drew Alan Phillips, Jeffrey Puglisi, Daniel Sullivan, Tracey Ann Valenzuela and Christopher Quang Vo. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:01 am
Code § 35-38-1-7.5) is placed within the criminal code, the provision for registration and the duration of the registration period is within the statutory code provisions dealing with the Department of Correction. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:00 am
Sullivan, 2020 ONCA 333; 2022 SCC 19 (39270) R. v. [read post]
