Search for: "Sullivan v. Georgia" Results 81 - 100 of 158
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am by INFORRM
An appeal is expected, which would give the Supreme Court the opportunity to reconsider the so-called “Sullivan standard,” which states that is ought to be difficult for any public official to prove that a falsehood was damaging enough to surmount First Amendm [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:10 pm by Adrian Lurssen
Ceglia v Facebook - Answer and Affirmative Defenses | Paul Ceglia v. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
For these reasons, we conclude that the temporary restraining order, as well as the permanent injunction restraining Sullivan's speech, constitute unconstitutional prior restraints in derogation of Sullivan's right to speak. [read post]
2 May 2019, 10:48 am
   The factors originally set out in the Georgia Pacific test are drafted to catch everything relevant in a trial and they need be reigned in. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Research and Resources “Institutional Actors in New York Times v Sullivan”, Paul Horwitz, Georgia Law Review, Forthcoming. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
Sullivan, 559 N.W.2d 740, 747 (Neb. 1997) (dictum), followed in Nolan v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:52 am by Emma Snell
The Marquette Law School poll, which was conducted just days after the court overturned Roe v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:24 am
Kaplan on Monday prevented attorneys Robert Fink and Caroline Rule from withdrawing as defense counsel to former KPMG partner Richard Smith in United States v. [read post]