Search for: "Supervisor, Domestic Claims" Results 81 - 100 of 356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2018, 4:30 am by Robert Loeb, Sarah Grant
 Even where Congress expressly establishes domestic criminal aiding and abetting liability, the question of whether to impose such liability for civil claims as well is still deemed a separate legislative policy that typically requires legislative action. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 3:33 pm
 It also allows claims based on paychecks and annuity payments which would allow retirees to bring claims. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 9:56 am by Tyler Bernstein
In other words, under the existing version of A.B. 171, if an employee who files a claim for sexual harassment is caught stealing the next day and immediately terminated, the employee will be able to claim protection under A.B. 171’s automatic, rebuttable presumption. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 6:00 am by Jane Turner
Donovan reported the issue to her supervisor, and discovered her department did not want to investigate the officer. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
Lastly, employers of domestic labors and farm workers must provide workers comp coverage. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 8:59 am by Cindy Cohn
In one week the Board of Supervisors reversed its position on giving the SFPD the ability to deploy killer robots. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
After the court ordered that A pay the supervisor's fees, he did not visit at all. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 5:47 am by Eugene Volokh
Sarganis contends that highlighting portions of the record, referring to it as an act of domestic violence and adding information about the definition of third degree assault constitute defamation. [read post]
23 May 2019, 2:20 am by Jeremy Saland
To learn more about Family Court Act Article 10 Neglect Petitions and New York Domestic Violence crimes, click through the provided links. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 10:46 am by Donna
Many employees have the mistaken belief that, if they are being harassed by their employer, a supervisor, or a co-worker or they are in a "hostile work environment" that they automatically have a claim against the employer. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 9:43 am by WCK Director
Extensive experience confirms improving the internal handling of return to work reduces overall claim durations. [read post]
18 May 2021, 10:11 am by Matt Gluck
  The predominantly Republican Maricopa County Board of Supervisors condemned the county’s ongoing audit of the 2020 election on Monday, reports the Washington Post. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 8:28 pm
Partridge, No. 07-20440 In a suit by a dentist dismissed from his position at a state-run home after his return from active military duty, summary judgment for defendant-employer is affirmed in part, and vacated with claims dismissed in part, where: 1) no federal jurisdiction existed to hear plaintiff's Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) claim, as a USERRA claim against the state as an employer was required to be brought in state court;… [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 1:09 pm by Jen Yackley
Unfortunately for some, there are allegations of domestic abuse or infidelity. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 3:07 pm
However, employers are presumed absolutely liable for a hostile work environment created by its supervisors. [read post]
As a result, duplicates of the supervisor's e-mail were automatically forwarded to the IRS agent without the supervisor's knowledge or consent. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 4:00 am by admin
Sandusky’s victims might have valid claims against Joe Paterno. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 11:39 am by Eugene Volokh
[The California Court of Appeal reversed, in an interesting case about allegations of physical abuse—and claims that the allegations were themselves a form of "abuse. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 7:09 am by Lorene Park
When it comes to firing someone for threatening coworkers or supervisors, courts generally side with employers. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 6:54 am by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
The Law Division dismissed the case, but the Appellate Division reversed this order with regard to his marital status discrimination claim. [read post]