Search for: "Supreme People's Court Monitor" Results 81 - 100 of 1,172
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2022, 8:40 am by JURIST Staff
This rushed, desperate attempt came in the aftermath of a draft US Supreme Court decision leaked earlier this month that would overturn the seminal case of Roe v Wade (1973). [read post]
6 May 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Sixth Circuit: Luckily the Supreme Court has never gone there, so we're gonna say no. [read post]
4 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
What will America become if, as reported, the five most conservative members of the US Supreme Court angrily and emphatically overrule Roe v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
In light of this week’s leak of Samuel Alito’s draft opinion by which the Supreme Court will soon overrule Roe v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" No, said the California Supreme Court: [W]e are not persuaded that imposing a duty on landlords to withhold rental units from those they believe to be gang members is a fair or workable solution to [the] problem [of gang violence], or one consistent with our state's public policy as a whole. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 am by Eugene Volokh
This Court should thus decide the motion under federal law, and is not bound by the state court's order. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 4:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
" The Court likewise rejected the state's contention that the bookseller's "compliance with the Commission's directives" was in any meaningful sense "voluntary," despite the fact that a bookseller was technically "';free' to ignore" that body's notices: "People do not," the Court emphasized, "lightly… [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 10:16 am by Eugene Volokh
City of Philadelphia), whether as to the result (in Hobby Lobby) or the reasoning (in Fulton), can make people think that religious exemption claims always so divide the Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 8:03 am by Eugene Volokh
But given that the Supreme Court has referred to these sorts of social media platforms as "the modern public square," I think it's worth monitoring what constraints those platforms impose on the expression of various views, whether in satire or otherwise. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 5:01 am by Jeff Kosseff
When the poster contacted her, Gray told me, she immediately thought of the Supreme Court's opinions that protected anonymous speech, but it was unclear how a court would react to such an argument as applied to a John Doe subpoena. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 8:20 am by Michael C. Dorf
Further, the Supreme Court seems likely to restrict or even abolish affirmative action. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:41 am by Dave Maass
Thankfully, the court hearing the FOIA suit nixed the FDA’s snail’s pace plan to review just 500 pages of documents a month. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 9:31 am by Cyberleagle
  To the extent that the duty requires hosts to monitor for illegality, that departs from the long-standing principle embodied in Article 15 of the eCommerce Directive prohibiting the imposition of general monitoring obligations. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 2:30 pm by Eugene Volokh
Indiana (1973), the Supreme Court recognized that words can implicitly encourage violence or lawlessness. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:00 am by Sherry F. Colb
How did Kavanaugh come to sit on the Supreme Court? [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 6:02 am by Eugene Volokh
" The Magistrate Judge had since retired, and didn't challenge the discipline, so the court concluded that it should "accept the [retired judge's] stipulations and take no additional action. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:02 am by Eric Goldman
Thus, it’s “plausible that Defendants had ‘a continuous business relationship’ with traffickers and Plaintiff’s ex-boyfriend, and that Defendants and traffickers ‘have established a pattern of conduct or could be said to have a tacit agreement.'” Benefit from the venture. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 5:31 am by Eugene Volokh
" And the court's legal analysis: "Judicial records belong to the American people; they are public, not private, documents. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 5:31 am by Eugene Volokh
" And the court's legal analysis: "Judicial records belong to the American people; they are public, not private, documents. [read post]