Search for: "Sweeten v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 173
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2021, 9:56 pm
The opposition relied on Article 8(4) EUTMR, stating that it was entitled under the applicable law in the UK to prevent the use of the mark applied for by means of ‘extended’ passing off (a concept that shall be elaborated on below). [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 5:50 pm
United States Gen. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 5:06 am
Ackerman v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 4:13 am
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 4:13 am
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
Table 1: Sales Tax Treatment of Food is Haphazard in State Tax Codes Unequal Treatment of Groceries, Candy, and Soda in State Tax Codes as of January 1, 2018 State State General Sales Tax Grocery Treatment Candy Treated the Same as Groceries? [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 4:17 am
Many states have legal rules that call for religious exemptions from generally applicable state and local laws.[49] Some such rules are enacted by statute, using so-called “Religious Freedom Restoration Acts. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 6:47 am
Holk v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:13 pm
English courts have stated more clearly that Art 8 does not protect corporate reputation (Euromoney Institutional Investor Plc v Aviation News Ltd at [20]), and also seem suspicious of the idea that it is protected by A1P1 (Ajinomoto Sweeteners V Asda Stores Ltd at [29]). [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 4:59 am
Delacruz v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 4:50 am
Forcellati v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 9:09 am
This decision, The Clorox Company Puerto Rico v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 11:24 am
Warren v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 11:26 am
Woolf v. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 11:41 am
POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 1:13 am
But the judge also said in Stern v. [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:00 pm
” United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 2:38 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 6:20 am
A portion of the law was recently reversed in the court case Phantom Fireworks Showrooms, LLC v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 10:30 am
A portion of the law was recently reversed in the court case Phantom Fireworks Showrooms, LLC v. [read post]
