Search for: "Swift v. White"
Results 81 - 100
of 147
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2015, 4:29 am
The red letters are also outlined in white in and there are drip marks on the ‘L’. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm
Thus, a one-year budgetary cycle might not be swift or agile enough to manage rapidly emerging cyber-threats. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 11:05 am
For example, in 1990, Chief Assistant United States Attorney Mary Jo White of the Eastern District of New York, Chief of the Criminal Division Bill Muller and Chief of the Narcotics Unit David Shapiro, among others, issued a detailed, thoughtful 27-page memorandum analyzing the government’s disclosure obligation at the time and recommending procedures to be followed when dealing with informants and other government witnesses. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 8:04 am
That is the key issue in the new case, Friedrichs v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:25 am
The Supreme Court in McCutcheon v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 1:53 am
Whyte & MacKay Ltd v Origin Wine UK Ltd and Dolce Co Invest Inc [2015] EWHC 1271 (Ch) is the latest of Mr Justice Arnold's trade mark rulings in the Chancery Division, England and Wales. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 1:42 am
Never too late 34 [week ending Sunday 22 February] – Bill Gates goes to China | Ms Swift's issue with trade marks | TMs and jurisdiction for online infringement cases | UK's Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys and the EPO | Divani & Divani | UK first in global IP enforcement | SUEPO… [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm
[iii] SWIFT is a global financial messaging service. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
This project, that I’m also privileged to participate in, involves an Independent Commission of Experts comprised of Canadian Supreme Court Justice Ian Binnie, Alex Whiting at Harvard, Anita Ramasastry at the University of Washington and others. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:57 pm
This is a claim articulated most fully (so far) by Justice Scalia in his brief concurrence in Ricci v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:51 am
See, e.g., LaMorte Burns & Co. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:51 am
See, e.g., LaMorte Burns & Co. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 9:19 am
Reactions to the decision were swift and numerous. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am
The Divisional Court (Gross LJ, Swift and Foskett JJ) began by considering the relevance of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Gillan v UK 50 EHRR 1105. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 10:57 am
Regardless of the reason, John Hudson at Foreign Policy asserts that the White House is in “damage control” over the comment. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
White which they are asserting for the principle that anytime the Legislature takes away a right that had previously been guaranteed to the citizens of the state, it must provide a "reasonable alternative. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 1:30 pm
These bounty orders remained in effect until at least 1868, when their constitutionality was finally questioned by the Minnesota Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:03 am
These bounty orders remained in effect until at least 1868, when their constitutionality was finally questioned by the Minnesota Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:44 pm
A Poisonous Affair: America, Iraq, and the Gassing of Halabja by Joost R. [read post]
