Search for: "T. Arnold" Results 81 - 100 of 3,339
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2023, 7:58 am by Karina Lytvynska
I looked up to photographers like Arnold Newman, Richard Avedon, Irving Penn, David Bailey, and Helmut Newman. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Tad Lipsky
Arnold proved no less enthusiastic about antitrust than Jackson. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:06 pm by Rose Hughes
It is difficult to align the interpretation of G 2/21 by Lord Justice Arnold in Sandoz v BMS with the Board of Appeal decision in T 0116/18 reported in the minutes of oral proceedings. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 5:51 am by Will Newman
Or of luminaries like Sigmund Freud and Arnold Schwarzenegger. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 7:47 am by Christopher J. Walker
Amy clerked for Justice John Paul Stevens of the Supreme Court during the October Term 2002, Judge Guido Calabresi of the Second Circuit, and Judge Harry T. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 7:47 am by Christopher J. Walker
Amy clerked for Justice John Paul Stevens of the Supreme Court during the October Term 2002, Judge Guido Calabresi of the Second Circuit, and Judge Harry T. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 1:06 pm by Eugene Volokh
Arnold and Associates was the second firm Croce hired, after his original lawyers at Kegler Brown Hill & Ritter dropped his cases and sued him because he wasn't paying his bills. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 1:00 am by Rose Hughes
(T 0471/20) (5 Jan 2022)EPO Board of Appeal toes the party-line on description amendments (T 1024/18) (4 April 2022)Board of Appeal case law against the description amendment requirement starts to mount up (T 2194/19) (16 Nov 2022)Another Board of Appeal enters the fray on description amendments (T 3097/19) (27 Nov 2022)Board of Appeal poised on the brink of a referral on description amendments (T 56/21) (26 July 2023) [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
The decision clarifies that a technical effect may be plausible without requiring the provision of tests or data; this is precisely the opposite of what was decided by Judge Arnold in the United Kingdom. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am by INFORRM
United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk has said facial recognition could create “mass surveillance of our public spaces, destroying any concept of privacy. [read post]