Search for: "T. D. M. v. State of Alabama" Results 81 - 100 of 214
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
In The Hollywood Reporter, Eriq Gardner reports that the court “has finally decided that it won’t review Lenz v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:18 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  I was encouraged by page 42 of the transcript, where the Alabama Solicitor General notes that the court has previously held that extension of a previously recognized right can't be done in a case governed by § 2254(d)(1).JUSTICE KENNEDY: What was the case where we said that? [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
The first is McWilliams v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm by Bill Marler
As a result, HDOH ordered this product embargoed (not to be sold, purchased, or consumed) throughout the state, and the temporary closure of all Genki Sushi restaurants on Oahu and Kauai. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:01 pm
Not to be struck by lightning and being bit by a polar bear, but you know what I'm talking about. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 9:44 am by John Elwood
United States, 15-1503, and Overton v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
I think it needs to be more, and I think the State's following my previous directive that if they don't have more, I'm going to be suppressing these stops. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm by John Elwood
Alabama, 15-7553, Flowers v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:08 am by John Elwood
Alabama, 15-7939, a capital case out of Alabama (hate it when the caption spoils the surprise). [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am by John Elwood
  So this week, we thought we’d use an organizing theme that – aside from providing the basis for obscure pilots on a little-used medium called “broadcast TV” — hasn’t really been topical in about four hundred years, or at the most recent, since high-school English. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:36 am by John Elwood
Why haven’t these cases been GVR’d yet? [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
The case revolved around a column by Latham entitled “Why left feminists don’t like kids”. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
 In our view, the Third Restatement properly states the LID, and therefore we adopt §6(d) as our expression of it. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
The State of Alabama paid his tuition, books, room and board. [read post]