Search for: "TARGET CORPORATION v. US " Results 81 - 100 of 2,522
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2018, 12:04 am by Kevin LaCroix
Department of Justice to address the “piling on” problem that corporate defendants can sometimes face – that is, the accumulation of penalties that can arise when multiple different federal agencies pursue enforcement actions against the corporate target based on the same alleged misconduct. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
West Seal Inc., 2012 TMOB 114, 103 C.P.R. (4th) 136, at para. 27; Dollar General Corporation v. 2900319 Canada Inc., 2018 FC 778, 157 C.P.R. (4th) 318 at para. 27. [11] See Miller Thomson LLP v. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 8:17 am
Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes Are M&A Contract Clauses Value Relevant to Target and Bidder Shareholders? [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 8:17 am
Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes Are M&A Contract Clauses Value Relevant to Target and Bidder Shareholders? [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 2:09 pm by Patricia Salkin
Lavender v Zoning Board of Appeals of Town of Bolton, 2016 WL 3919056 (NYAD 3 Dept 7/21/016)Filed under: Accessory Uses, Current Caselaw - New York, Uncategorized [read post]
16 Apr 2025, 2:56 pm by NARF
RFK Jr. wants to target chronic disease in US Tribes. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  This trend of decisions may raise the risk of over-reaching by target managers and acquirers in corporate transactions. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 11:33 am
  Meanwhile, Shareholders argued that the court should apply an exception to the rule developed by the Court of Appeals in Boland v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
  He started by considering the way that the terms CSR is used and pointed to the general sense of its meaning. [read post]