Search for: "TAXPAYERS OF MICHIGAN V STATE OF MICHIGAN "
Results 81 - 100
of 230
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2017, 5:02 am
App. 2006); United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am
Michigan Department of Treasury, 16-687 Issues: (1) Whether the Multistate Tax Compact has the status of a contract that binds its signatory states and requires them to allow taxpayers to elect to use the compact’s equally weighted apportionment formula until the state prospectively withdraws from the compact; (2) whether Michigan’s retroactive repeal of, and withdrawal from, the compact violated the contracts clause; (3) whether… [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 7:59 am
Michigan Department of Treasury 16-698 Issues: (1) Whether a state, without violating the constitutional bar against the impairment of contracts, can retroactively withdraw from the Multistate Tax Compact so as to divest taxpayers of benefits under that compact for a period of 6 1/2 years before that withdrawal; and (2) whether, consistent with due process, a state can, by statute, change its tax laws retroactively for a period of more than six years, when… [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am
Michigan Department of Treasury, 16-698, and DIRECTV Group Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:45 am
Michigan Department of Treasury 16-698 Issues: (1) Whether a state, without violating the constitutional bar against the impairment of contracts, can retroactively withdraw from the Multistate Tax Compact so as to divest taxpayers of benefits under that compact for a period of 6 1/2 years before that withdrawal; and (2) whether, consistent with due process, a state can, by statute, change its tax laws retroactively for a period of more than six years, when… [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 12:24 pm
The United States Supreme Court denied review of Gillette Co. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 11:36 am
These ongoing payments demonstrate how the unlawful actions and missteps of state leaders and employees can become costly for Michigan taxpayers. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 11:36 am
These ongoing payments demonstrate how the unlawful actions and missteps of state leaders and employees can become costly for Michigan taxpayers. [read post]
18 May 2016, 11:00 am
For example, in Erwin v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:15 am
However, in the recent Arizona case of Duckett v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:15 am
However, in the recent Arizona case of Duckett v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:15 am
However, in the recent Arizona case of Duckett v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:15 am
However, in the recent Arizona case of Duckett v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 10:27 am
These how we invested in community colleges and land grant colleges like Michigan State....So the people in Flint, and across Michigan, and around the country -- individuals and church groups and non-for-profits and community organizations -- you've proven that the American people will step up when required. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 5:48 am
In 1969, Timothy Leary challenged his arrest for possession of marijuana under the Act; the case of Leary v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 7:38 am
More Blog Posts: Flint Water Lawsuits Could Cost Millions for Michigan Taxpayers, Michigan Injury Lawyer Blog, March 1, 2016. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 9:15 am
Obergefell v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 8:57 am
" <> Turlock Irrigation District v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 7:24 pm
In 1969, Timothy Leary challenged his arrest for possession of marijuana under the Act; the case of Leary v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 3:10 pm
Michigan State won the game 76-70. [read post]
