Search for: "THOMAS v. THOMAS"
Results 81 - 100
of 21,863
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2024, 3:37 pm
Thomas Pressly, has argued the legislation would not prevent the prescribing or dispensing of the drugs “for legitimate reasons. [read post]
24 May 2024, 4:00 am
” In this episode, Craig is joined by Attorney Kirby Thomas West from the Institute for Justice to discuss the recent SCOTUS decision in Culley v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 2:01 am
In Duvall v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 2:01 am
In Duvall v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 10:05 pm
A. v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 9:01 pm
”It is hard to counter that view when Justices like Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito flaunt their political sympathies or when the Court trashed its own precedents on the way to overturning Roe v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 6:03 pm
Justice Thomas joined the opinion in all, except Part III C. [read post]
23 May 2024, 3:51 pm
The following is a guest post from Travis Crum: The wait for Alexander v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas filed an opinion concurring in part with the majority. [read post]
23 May 2024, 7:03 am
Justice Clarence Thomas issued an opinion concurring in part. [read post]
23 May 2024, 3:00 am
(Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times) Ryan King, a spokesman for the office of the University of California’s president, Michael V. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:00 pm
It’s true that CFPB v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 12:42 pm
On May 16, Justice Thomas issued the majority opinion in which the Supreme Court held, by a 7-2 vote, that the CFPB’s funding mechanism comported with the Appropriations Clause of the Constitution which states, in relevant part, in Article I, Section 9, Clause 7: “No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law…” Specifically, Justice Thomas held: “Under the Appropriations Clause, an appropriation… [read post]
22 May 2024, 5:30 am
Justice Thomas repeated his charge that arguments in favor of racial preferences mirror the arguments made by segregationists. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:36 pm
Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch would have overruled Smith. [read post]
21 May 2024, 6:46 am
Three Recent Unanimous Decisions In Muldrow v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 11:00 pm
In the case of Dwyer v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:54 pm
As Justice Thomas wrote in CFPB v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am
Shugerman, SEC v. [read post]
