Search for: "Taylor v. Doe" Results 81 - 100 of 2,029
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2023, 7:47 am by Eugene Volokh
"] From the decision earlier this month by Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain (S.D.N.Y.) in Hong v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Let me illustrate my concerns with reference to Taylor Swift, who is, incidentally a fan of very different cats.[2] Recently, I was discussing with my nieces and a friend of theirs, all around thirteen years old, what they would pay to see Taylor Swift in concert. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 1:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The Second Circuit said it joined "the growing list of our sister circuits and conclude that Janus does not relieve Appellant of her contractual duties to pay union dues under the Membership Agreement. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 1:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The Second Circuit said it joined "the growing list of our sister circuits and conclude that Janus does not relieve Appellant of her contractual duties to pay union dues under the Membership Agreement. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
” X does not define what it considers biometric, though other companies have used the term to describe data gleaned from a person’s face, eyes and fingerprints. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 8:08 am by admin
Saying that a tail is a leg does not make it a leg. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 11:08 am by Bill Marler
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:03 am by Eugene Volokh
Finally, our determination that the privilege can apply to Chapter 98B claims finds support, by analogy, from the Supreme Court's decision in Taylor v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:51 am by Public Employment Law Press
As  to conducting disciplinary hearings in absentia, in Mujtaba v NYS Dept. of Education, 148 A.D.2d 819, the Appellate Division held “due process does not require that [the charged individual] be present at an administrative hearing, but rather requires notice of the charges and an opportunity to be heard. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:51 am by Public Employment Law Press
As  to conducting disciplinary hearings in absentia, in Mujtaba v NYS Dept. of Education, 148 A.D.2d 819, the Appellate Division held “due process does not require that [the charged individual] be present at an administrative hearing, but rather requires notice of the charges and an opportunity to be heard. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
One of the leading authorities in the area of promotional liability is the Weirum v. [read post]