Search for: "Taylor v. Social Security"
Results 81 - 100
of 251
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 9:53 am
House of Representatives v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 6:17 am
Posted by Ruth V. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm
Data Security Management in Digital Business, Oana Buzianu, Independent. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
heard 4 and 5 February 2020 (Etherton MR, David Richards and Coulson LJJ) Various Claimants v MGN, heard, 28 to 31 January 2020 (Mann J) Dawson-Damer & Ors v Taylor Wessing LLP & Ors, heard 29 and 30 January 2020 (Floyd, Newey and Arnold LJJ) W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants, heard 6 and 7 Nov [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm
The Irish Times had a piece “Turf Club’s security head claims defamation over yard inspection letter”. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 5:25 am
The trial judge ordered and received a presentence investigation report (“PSI”) which stated that Taylor received Social Security Disability insurance benefits of $683 per month, and other information about Taylor’s health and employment history. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 8:58 am
Taylor, 942 F.3d 205 (Nov. 5, 2019). [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 7:56 am
Adkins ordered and received a presentence investigation report (“PSI”) which stated that Taylor received Social Security Disability insurance benefits of $683 per month for a mental disability. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
“CIA-Backed Afghan Paramilitaries Behind Unlawful Killing Surge,” by Patricia Grossman for Just Security (Nov. 8, 2019): “Some U.S. officials have called for preserving the CIA’s parallel operations and these strike forces even after a U.S. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:55 pm
Frank Taylor, the former undersecretary of homeland security for intelligence and analysis; Richard Stengel, the former undersecretary of state for public diplomacy and public affairs; Matt Blaze, a professor of computer science and law at Georgetown University; and Ginny Badanes, the director for strategic projects in Microsoft's defending democracy program. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am
Taylor, the State Department’s Chargé d’Affaires Ad Interim in Ukraine, and George Kent, the deputy assistant secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:45 am
United States — In its prior decision in Taylor v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:52 am
The cases cited by Bell were Social Security appeal cases involving the same attorney who had failed to keep actual time records spent on his cases numerous times. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:38 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Elhady v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 1:55 pm
Catherine Martin Christopher, Nevertheless She Persisted: Comparing Roe v. [read post]
31 Aug 2019, 6:22 am
Jurecic also shared a ruling in Al Shimari v. [read post]
