Search for: "Terry v. Mays" Results 81 - 100 of 1,461
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Roger Parloff
In every bid to transfer venue that Capitol riot defendants have raised, the key precedent the government has cited in response has been the same: Haldeman v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:02 am by Stephanie Pell
Was something akin to the Terry-stop reasonable suspicion standard sufficient for law enforcement to compel the data it wanted through a 2703(d) order, or did the ECPA require a higher probable cause standard and thus a warrant? [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Administrative determinations may be challenged in a CPLR article 78 proceeding only after the determination is final (see CPLR 7801[1]; Matter of Greenberg v Assessor of Town of Scarsdale, 121 AD3d 986, 989). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Administrative determinations may be challenged in a CPLR article 78 proceeding only after the determination is final (see CPLR 7801[1]; Matter of Greenberg v Assessor of Town of Scarsdale, 121 AD3d 986, 989). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 8:01 am by Matthew Tokson
For example, short-duration police stops are constitutional with less than probable cause, under Terry v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 4:48 am by Jeff Welty
Justice Barringer concurred in part and concurred in the result, but felt that the reasonable suspicion standard under Terry v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 5:00 am by Matthew Tokson
For example, short-duration police stops are permissible with less than probable cause, under Terry v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:29 am
” On May 13, 2022, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis issued a ruling in Crest v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:29 am
” On May 13, 2022, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis issued a ruling in Crest v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 3:48 am by SHG
The Washington State Supreme Court, in State v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:08 pm by Jillian Moss
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
A modest variation, similar to Terri Peretti’s,[9] would reflect the desirability that, in each four-year Presidential term, at least one appointment to the Court be made.[10]  In the last 45 years, there have been four 4-year presidential terms that had no appointments to the Court.[11]A statute could authorize the conditional establishment of an additional seat on the Court (up to a limited total) in order to try to allow each four-year presidency to choose at least one… [read post]