Search for: "The Office Of The Ohio Disciplinary Counsel For The Supreme Court Of The State Of Ohio"
Results 81 - 100
of 104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2010, 6:19 am
However, Supreme Court doctrine has developed a not-very-well-theorized distinction unknown to false advertising law generally: “inherently” misleading speech may simply be banned. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:30 am
For example, the Colorado supreme court rejected mandatory reporting stating it was the first step toward mandatory pro bono — a destination the court did not want to arrive at, hence it would not take the first step. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 7:39 pm
Accordingly, the holding of the Supreme Court of Ohio was contrary to clearly established federal law as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States in Beck v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 3:46 am
Ketterer, the Ohio Supreme Court holds that Baker’s one-document rule doesn’t apply to capital cases, since RC 2929.03(F) requires the trial court to issue a separate sentencing opinion, in addition to the judgment of conviction. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court denied relief in an order entered January 8, 2009.[7] The Court was forced to reconsider its ruling when, on January 26, 2009, the United States Attorney’s Office announced that it had charged Judge Ciavarella and his mentor, Judge Michael T. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 8:53 pm
Among the other assignments of error, the Court also overruled Fry’s claim that his death sentence must be set aside because the trial judge filed the sentencing order in his case before allowing Fry to address the court” [Ohio Clerk of Court's Office] State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 4:35 am
Finally, under the heading of no good deed goes unpunished we have Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Plaintiff’s counsel served my client with the Complaint by mailing it to my law office via certified mail. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 6:54 am
Office of Disciplinary Counsel of Supreme Court of Ohio (1985) was the appropriate standard of review. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:29 am
After the Supreme Court’s decision two months ago in Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 3:42 am
Smith was one more decision than the Ohio Supreme Court came out with last week; not even a disciplinary opinion chastising some miscreant attorney. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 4:44 am
A great win for a lawyer, a major break for the client, a silly and frankly wrongheaded decision.The state asked the Ohio Supreme Court to hear the case, which it did. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 3:30 am
The Supreme Court Rules of Practice specify that when a county prosecutor files a notice of appeal to the Supreme Court, he has to serve a copy on the Ohio Public Defender. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 am
Reversed a district court holding that would have allowed Ohio State football player Maurice Clarett to enter the NFL draft early.Williams v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 3:29 am
The argument is premised on a 1976 Supreme Court decision, State ex rel. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 6:42 am
Questions may be directed to Supreme Court Regulation Counsel John S. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 9:56 am
The entry stated the sentence Roberts would get, some explanation of why and gave some history of the case.And:John Coughlan, disciplinary counsel for the Ohio Supreme Court, said the problem with the practice of having the prosecutor prepare the entry was that it constituted ex-parte (meaning one-sided) communications because it excluded defense counsel from being involved. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 12:15 pm
The federal government provides funds to Ohio agencies, which are then passed through to the LCCFFC. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Coughlan, Disciplinary Counsel for the Supreme Court of Ohio, appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment to plaintiff William O'Neill in this action seeking to enjoin enforcement of three canons of the Ohio Code of Judicial Conduct. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something… [read post]
