Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Paradise" Results 81 - 100 of 121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2021, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Mainlanders could confiscate land, redirect taxes, and waste workers’ lives to build paradises in the mountains. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:30 am by azatty
They pitted small v. small employers, large v. large, municipal, gov’t., etc. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am by David Pozen
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 4:54 am
  Given the steep requirements of Article V, (1) is virtually impossible. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 11:19 am by Rob Jordan
Paradise Professor of Natural Resources Law at the Stanford Law School. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 4:39 am by SHG
We've suffered Dred Scott, Plessy v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 9:10 am
  Heck, I may even drive down the Thruway and tweet oral arguments of the LMK Psychological Services v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
: (Afro-IP),If education and pricing policy fail, says Adobe in Nigeria, we can still sue: (Afro-IP),South African arm of Chrysler objects to advertisement by Indian vehicle maker Mahindra and Mahindra that uses the term "jeep": (Afro-IP), (Spicy IP),Kenya’s call for anti-counterfeit legislation… amongst other changes: (Afro-IP),Kenya: Shared computer use raises privacy, confidentiality issues: (Afro-IP)AustraliaChanges to grace period for trade mark renewal:… [read post]
Paradise Professor of Natural Resources Law, a Senior Fellow at the Woods Institute for the Environment, and a Professor in Stanford University’s Doerr School of Sustainability. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:09 am
 Afro-IP, the IPKat and many other blogs are written by INTA members and people who support and publicise your programmes. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 3:17 pm by David Lat
— author of the colorful opinion in Gustafson v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]