Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Smith"
Results 81 - 100
of 3,488
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2022, 8:01 pm
President Trump was not one of those people. [read post]
24 May 2018, 4:55 pm
I find Circuit Judge Smith’s concurring opinion in Naruto v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 6:35 pm
I gotta agree with Judge Milan Smith in this one. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 12:03 pm
In a 4-1 decision (People v Smith,2012 NY Slip Op 01896 (3/16/2012) the Appellate Division, Fourth Department agreed with Mr. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 9:41 am
In all instances, Reed Smith has tried to make carefully considered business decisions and has communicated with the people affected by those decisions.We have decided to maintain a 2010 Summer Program, although it will be a smaller program than in prior years. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:22 pm
In Stern v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 11:37 am
Let's test your knowledge. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 8:16 am
Peggie Smith, Welfare, Child Care, and the People Who Care: Union Representation of Family Child Care Providers (44). [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 5:31 am
Peggie Smith, Welfare, Child Care, and the People Who Care: Union Representation of Family Child Care Providers (50). [read post]
24 Nov 2007, 6:04 am
Peggie Smith, Welfare, Child Care, and the People Who Care: Union Representation of Family Child Care Providers (52). [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 10:32 am
Peggie Smith, Welfare, Child Care, and the People Who Care: Union Representation of Family Child Care Providers (49). [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 5:31 am
Peggie Smith, Welfare, Child Care, and the People Who Care: Union Representation of Family Child Care Providers (50). [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 11:33 am
Peggie Smith, Welfare, Child Care, and the People... [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 12:03 pm
That's the question my colleague, Shaun Martin, is asking over at his California Appellate Report blog, in connection with People v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 10:32 am
Peggie Smith, Welfare, Child Care, and the People Who Care: Union Representation of Family Child Care Providers (49). [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 8:45 pm
For example, in February 2008, we noted that the Court in People v Smith (2008 NY Slip Op 00904 [4th Dept 2008)held that [W]e agree with defendant that the court erred in calculating the expiration date of the order of protection without taking into account the jail time credit to which she is entitled (see People v Clinkscales, 35 AD3d 1266, 1267; People v Hare, 27 AD3d 1171, 1172, lv denied 6 NY3d 892, 894, 898). [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:01 am
However, in coming to this ruling, Judge Leon distinguishes the 1979 decision, Smith v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 1:41 pm
In People v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:57 am
Note: This is a guest post by Guy Hamilton-Smith. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:13 am
As noted in the New York Law Journal, the Court of Appeals, by Judge Robert Smith, granted leave in People v. [read post]
