Search for: "The Tri-State Consumer, Inc."
Results 81 - 100
of 1,004
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2018, 7:50 am
Other states have tried to limit the ways in which cannabis can be consumed, as is the case in Florida. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 10:58 am
Nokia, Inc., 625 F.3d 97 (10th Cir. 2010), the Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s ruling that the plaintiff in a consumer class action waived his objection to removal of the action to federal court through his failure to timely file his motion for remand. [read post]
27 May 2012, 6:57 am
Supreme Court has unanimously held that the term "debt collector" "applies to a lawyer who 'regularly,' through litigation, tries to collect consumer debts" on behalf of a client. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 12:49 pm
Contrary to NYL's contention, however, "compliance with this minimum standard [does not] automatically relieve a manufacturer or importer of state common law liability" (Colon v BIC USA, Inc., 136 F Supp 2d 196, 208; see Liquore v Tri-Arc Mfg. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 5:39 am
It was an unusual move for the FCC, which has not tried to block a deal since 2002, The Washington Post reports. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 2:19 am
Faced with a Section 2(b) refusal because their proposed mark included simulations of the flags of the United States and of Bermuda, these two yacht clubs tried to amend their application drawing from the one on the left below, to the one on the right (flags removed). [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 7:39 am
LivePerson, Inc. v. [24]7.AI, Inc., 2018 WL 5849025, No. 17-cv-01268-JST (N.D. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:06 pm
But according to a recent lawsuit filed against Brown & Saenger, Inc., the South Dakota-based company allegedly tried to get around the need to abide by other states’ labor laws by specifying that all legal disputes were to be handled in South Dakota state court, under South Dakota law. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:18 am
In re El Galan, Inc., Serial No. 86961428 (February 1, 2018) [not precedential]: El Galan, Inc. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 5:30 pm
In dismissing the application in DHR International, Inc a company incorporated in Delaware in the United States of America v Challis [2015] NSWSC 1567, White J found that the plaintiff failed to show that the statements in the blog were false, ‘or at least materially false’ – a key element of the tort of injurious falsehood. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 8:14 pm
All One God Faith, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 2:54 am
Montana will be in uncharted territory if it tries to ban the app. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
Life After Hate, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 6:15 am
" Valassis asserted that, over a six-year period, NAM tried to monopolize the free-standing coupon insert (FSI) market. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 10:04 am
Paul Davis Restoration, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 6:51 am
Express Scripts, Inc., Case No. 4:09-CV705 FRB; Nov. 23, 2009 (E.D. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
The case was a purported class action (remember that) alleging violations of the Illinois Consumer And Deceptive Business Practices Act "and the materially similar consumer protection acts of other states." [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 6:26 am
United States, 140 Fed. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:26 am
Private plaintiffs have tried to evoke these pricing laws occasionally, as well, but often find significant hurdles as their burdens are typically higher than those faced by a state AG. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 6:20 am
In re ConAgra Foods, Inc., No. [read post]
