Search for: "Thomas v. Shaw" Results 81 - 100 of 181
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2017, 1:43 pm by Hans von Spakovsky
The general rule that the Supreme Court established in 1993 in yet another North Carolina case, Shaw v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 3:01 pm by Richard Pildes
But almost immediately after the start of that regime, beginning with the Shaw v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Wei Li, Montefiore East Tremont Practice, Off¬Label Medical Device use by Surgeons Public Health Law Session 1E – Room 242Overarching Themes in Public Health LawModerator: Jonathan Todres, Georgia State University College of LawLance Gable, Wayne State University Law School, Public and Private Models of Public Health Governance in Trump’s AmericaLewis Grossman, American University Washington College of Law, The Taming of Progressive ‘State Medicine’James Hodge, Arizona… [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:08 pm by Joy Waltemath
Maatman, Jr., co-chair of the Class Action Defense group of law firm Seyfarth Shaw LLP. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 3:40 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Indeed, this amendment conforms to the California Supreme Court’s decision in Duran v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 12:10 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Indeed, this amendment conforms to the California Supreme Court’s decision in Duran v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:52 pm by John Elwood
Alabama, 16-595, and two-time relists Shaw v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
New Frontiers in Reproductive Rights and Justice8:30 am – 10:15 amContinental Parlor 9, Ballroom Level, HiltonModerator: Kate Shaw, Benjamin N. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
” In The National Law Review, Robert Manoso and Thomas Ryan discuss the court’s Monday decision in Shaw v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 4:46 am by Edith Roberts
Analysis of yesterday’s oral argument in the federal bank fraud case Shaw v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 12:31 pm by Richard Hasen
The future of racial gerrymandering claims Finally, the future balance of the Court may determine what the Court does with the racial gerrymandering cause of action, which originated in the Supreme Court’s 1993 decision in Shaw v. [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 8:56 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 107690 (SD GA, Aug. 15, 2016), a Georgia federal magistrate judge recommended that an inmate be allowed to move ahead with most of his claims contending that he was denied meals in accordance with the tenets of his religion.In Thomas v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 9:14 am by Lyle Denniston
 The Court granted review of the new case, Shaw v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am by John Elwood
They argued, among other things, that (1) the three-judge panel ran afoul of Shaw v. [read post]