Search for: "Thomas v. Wal-Mart, Inc." Results 81 - 100 of 121
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2011, 3:47 pm by Stephen Wermiel
IMS Health Inc. may carry more weight. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:58 am by Nabiha Syed
Yesterday’s biggest opinion was one of the biggest of the Term:  Wal-Mart v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
  That is the case of Philip Morris USA, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:13 am by James R. Copland
In two major decisions today that will interest the readers of this site, the Supreme Court held that the class alleging gender discrimination against Wal-Mart was improperly certified in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:04 am
And Justice Scalia delivered the opinion of the Court in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:34 am by The Complex Litigator
I'll preface this brief post by noting that I have not had a chance to read the entire opinion, but the opnion in Walmart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 4:13 am by Lisa McElroy
  The third opinion from Thursday was another unanimous one, Talk America, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:15 pm by Eugene Lee
Also, as Andrew Cohen of the Atlantic Monthly points out, Concepcion is a foreshadowing of how the Supreme Court will likely rule on Wal-Mart v Dukes, a class action being brought by 1.5 million women against Wal-Mart for discriminatory pay practices. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm by Bexis
Richardson–Merrell, Inc., 584 A.2d 1383, 1386-88 (1991); Makripodis v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:40 pm by Lisa McElroy
In the second of this week’s opinions, the Court decided Astra USA, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:47 pm by Gareth
Applying Wal-Mart Stores, I conclude that the released conduct would not arise out of the  “identical factual predicate” as the conduct that is the subject of the settled claims. 396 F.3d at 107 (citation omitted). c. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:24 am by Adam Chandler
In Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
District Judge George Caram Steeh denied the Thomas More Law Center's request for an injunction against a provision in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that imposes a penalty on anyone who fails to buy or otherwise obtain health insurance by 2014.Automotive (Personal Jurisdiction): OVERSEAS GOODYEAR COMPANIES SAY THEY CAN'T BE SUED IN U.S., Goodyear Luxembourg Tires v. [read post]