Search for: "Tomlinson v. Tomlinson"
Results 81 - 100
of 504
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2016, 12:52 am
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of Matrix chambers and an editor of Inforrm [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 4:22 pm
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of Matrix Chambers and an editor of Inforrm [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 4:15 pm
In the case of ML and WW v Germany ([2018] ECHR 554) (available only French), the Fifth Section of the Court of Human Rights dismissed an Article 8 “right to be forgotten” application in respect of the historic publication by the media of information concerning a murder conviction. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:48 pm
In A Local Authority v. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm
Reliance was placed on the English case of Cartier International AG v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 4:23 pm
For example, in Standard Verlags GmbH v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 4:03 pm
45835/05, § 68, 31 July 2012; Dammann v. [read post]
29 Sep 2024, 9:15 am
Hugh Tomlinson KC is a member of the Matrix Chambers media and information group and an editor of Inforrm. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 1:47 am
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of Matrix Chambers and an editor of Inforrm. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:36 pm
This was first posted on 23 February 2010 and is the first part of a three part post in which Hugh Tomlinson QC considers the future of the law of privacy. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 4:05 pm
In the case of Milosavljević v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:05 pm
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a specialist in media and information law at Matrix Chambers and an editor of Inforrm. [read post]
1 May 2011, 12:00 am
The Prime Minister said last week that he was “uneasy” about the development of a privacy law by judges based on the European Convention when this should be a matter for parliament. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 9:04 am
In Caminiti v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 4:33 pm
This is the second time that the Strasbourg Court has considered the right to be forgotten (we wrote about the Court’s judgment in the Article 8 case of ML & WW v Germany, 28 June 2018, in an earlier post). [read post]
Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Information: Part 1 The European Convention – Hugh Tomlinson QC
4 May 2010, 5:38 pm
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of Matrix Chambers and of the Inforrm Committee. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 4:24 pm
In the case of Rubio Dosamantes v Spain (Judgment of 21 February 2017)(in French only) the Third Section held that the dismissal of the applicant’s domestic claims was a breach of her Article 8 rights. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:07 pm
The trial judges in Campbell v MGN and Douglas v Hello! [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 10:06 am
In the case of Stichting Ostade Blade v Netherlands (App 8406/06, 27 May 2014) the Third Section of the Court of Human Rights held that an Article 10 application by a Dutch magazine arising out of a police raid was inadmissible. [read post]
