Search for: "Tompkins v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 119
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2011, 4:06 am
United States; Plessy v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 8:32 am
United States, Plessy v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 9:49 am
United States 2. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:24 pm
Attorney Anna Tompkins should concern every American. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 7:53 pm
Insofar as the book may have been intended to make possible a law school course on “air law,” I would answer with a resounding no.The author footnote: “Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 7:53 pm
Insofar as the book may have been intended to make possible a law school course on “air law,” I would answer with a resounding no.The author footnote: “Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm
Rockwool Limited (Class 46) (IPKat) Copyright confusion (1709 Blog) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform legislation moves to senate floor (Patent Docs) (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Inventive Step) How will the new House members handle patent reform? [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:45 pm
Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 9:26 am
Tompkins. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:29 pm
P. 8(a) adopted by the United States Supreme Court in Ashcroft v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm
Rather:A federal court may act as a judicial pioneer when interpreting the United States Constitution and federal law. . . . [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
We disagree.In Hoffman, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit applied Pennsylvania law and concluded that there was sufficient evidence for the jury to find that the manufacturer failed to adequately test its drug to discover potentially harmful side-effects. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:36 am
Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 7:55 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:03 am
Inasmuch as plaintiffs elected to accept the settlement without asserting their current claim that they were entitled to an additional amount representing the architectural and engineering fees, the settlement gave rise to an accord and satisfaction (see Gimper, Inc. v Giacchetta, 221 AD2d 682, 684 [1995]; Hemingway v State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
17 May 2010, 2:13 pm
Luongo, Watchlists in United States and Canada: An Intricate Web, p.157 # Ruwantissa Abeyratne, The NW 253 Flight and the Global Framework of Aviation Security, p.167 # Special Report # Ruwantissa Abeyratne, Legal and Aeronautical Issues Concerning the Earthquake in Haiti, p.183 # Arpad Szakal, Conference Report European Air Law Association: 7th Munich Liability Seminar, p.195 # Case Note # Pablo Mendes de Leon, ATA and others v. the UK Secretary of State for… [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:44 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 4:37 am
" (emphasis added) And in United States v. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
