Search for: "Town v. Land Use Commission" Results 81 - 100 of 241
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
The County issued an erosion-control permit to allow the establishment of a vineyard on land currently used for grazing. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 9:57 am
”Facts:  A developer submitted a zoning application to the Prince George’s Planning Board of Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (the “Commission”) to develop a certain tract of land for a mixed-use town center. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:44 pm by Patricia Salkin
This case was the third appeal regarding two billboards in the Town of Collierville on land owned by Abbington Center. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:47 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
  The Coastal Commission had not yet determined whether ESHAs were present at the site and the site was explicitly excluded from the City’s coastal land use plan. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Techdirt reports that a US law firm has been fined $71,000 for filing legal claims based on false documents as part of a ‘reputation management strategy. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
And it looks like all the weird news stories are finally behind us. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am by Kelly Buchanan
This legislation essentially “forced unproductive Māori land into use” through a trustee system. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 6:36 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Citing the two step ripeness test, established by the United States Supreme Court in County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 6:36 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Citing the two step ripeness test, established by the United States Supreme Court in County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]