Search for: "Trade Co., Ltd." Results 81 - 100 of 2,389
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2009, 9:04 pm
Po Sun Hon Co., the Ninth Circuit considered a rare trade dress trial involving competing jewelry designs. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 10:16 am by Doug Isenberg
Eastman Kodak Co. won the latest round in its patent dispute with Apple Inc. and Research In Motion Ltd., a victory with the potential to generate more than $1 billion in new licensing revenue for the camera company. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 11:00 am
In the case of Monster Energy Company v Glamco Co, Ltd [2018] SGHC 238, the High Court was faced with the primary question of whether Glamco’s trade mark “SWEET MONSTER” in Class 30 was registrable in Singapore even though Monster Energy had earlier trade mark registrations for the word “MONSTER” (and variations thereof) in several classes in Singapore (section 8(2)(b) of the Trade Marks Act). [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 6:44 am by Doug Isenberg
Eastman Kodak Co. has lost a patent case against Apple Inc. and Research In Motion Ltd., dealing a blow to the onetime film giant’s efforts to raise billions of dollars by selling off its intellectual property. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
    Careful what you consent to: Adwords and ArgosArgos Ltd v Argos Systems Inc [2017] EWHC 231(February 2017)Argos is a well-known UK High Street retailer. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 11:56 am
., Arthur Liao, MHR Helmet Co., Ltd., Foshan Shunde Fengxing Helmets, Ltd., and Jiangmen Pengcheng Helmets, Ltd. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 8:13 am
In the initial proceedings, the United States maintained that the Defendants were traitors who had conveyed "American trade secrets" - specifically, "crown jewels" in the form of many millions worth of intellectual property belonging to Lilly - to Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine Co., Ltd., a company located in Shanghai, China. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:18 pm
” The CJEU in Case C-228/03 Gillette Co v LA-Laboratories Ltd Oy made clear that the condition of ‘honest use’: “…was in substance the expression of a duty to act fairly in relation to the legitimate interests of the trade mark owner. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 12:41 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Indianapolis, Indiana – Attorneys for Plaintiff, Engineered by Schildmeier, LLC of Anderson, Indiana, filed suit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Defendants, Amazing Parts Warehouse (d/b/a several different names) of Lexington, Kentucky, and Wuhn Xuelang Auto Parts Co., Ltd. of China, infringed its rights in United States Patent No. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:24 am
Recently, Chanel Co., Ltd. lost a trade mark infringement case regarding its ‘Double C’ logo in China. [read post]