Search for: "Trippe v. Trippe"
Results 81 - 100
of 101
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
Hauck, had concerned a trade mark for the shape of a child’s high chair (the “Tripp Trapp”) the design of which was also protected by copyright. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 3:20 am
[readers may recall that this issue has been recently addressed in Hauck, also known as the Tripp Trapp case and noted here]3) Should Article 3(1)(e)(ii) of [the Trade Marks Directive] be interpreted as precluding registration of shapes which are necessary to obtain a technical result with regard to the manner in which the goods are manufactured as opposed to the manner in which the goods function? [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 9:00 am
is not a trade mark says the CFI (IPKat) France Evian revamps its bottle with a little joywashing, teams up with designer Paul Smith (Class 99) Second HADOPI law faces constitutionality test by French Socialists (Intellectual Property Watch) Germany Good news for copyright infringers or a Trapp to Tripp designers? [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
Supreme Court dismisses appeal in Servier v Apotex. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
Tripp, 9 N.C. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 5:04 am
That’s not true everywhere; in Maryland, for example, both parties have to consent to it, as Linda Tripp found out. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 1:13 am
The same happened in the aftermath of the Puffin/Penguin case [United Biscuits v Asda, noted here]. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm
The libel claim in Hanson-Young v Leyonhjelm has been heard in the Federal Court. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 7:10 am
On Tuesday 30 July 2024 there was a statement in open court in the case of Singh v Cartland and a return date hearing the case of Synnovis Services v Persons Unknown. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 11:50 am
• Robert V. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 11:50 am
• Robert V. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
This essay explores the possible dual readings of AT&T v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 4:48 am
Tripp, 2022-NCSC-78, ___ N.C. ___ (June 17, 2022). [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:50 am
Tripp, 381 N.C. 617 (2022), and State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
This is what Roland has to say:In June, CJEU Advocate General Wathelet issued his opinion in Nestlé v Cadbury (Case C-215/14 [noted by the IPKat here].The perceived wisdom has since been that Nestlé's Kit Kat shape (left) must necessarily be unregistrable as a trade mark. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands to be… [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 3:10 pm
In Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Tripp, Houston, Texas, for amici Association of American Physicians & Surgeons, Inc. and Eagle Forum Education and Legal Defense Fund. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
(Editor’s Note: This post is based on a client memorandum by Jonathan C. [read post]
