Search for: "Turner v. Bounds"
Results 81 - 100
of 102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
Because lower courts are bound to follow this Court’s decisions until they are withdrawn or modified, however, Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm
A useful summary of this can be found in a case called Flannery & Anor v Halifax Estate Agencies Ltd [1999] EWCA Civ 81, where the Court of Appeal said : (1) The duty is a function of due process, and therefore of justice. [read post]
23 Jan 2021, 4:02 pm
Consortum, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm
The EEOC Determined in Mia Macy v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 5:34 am
One curious side-product of the ECJ's decisions in Gasser and Turner was that the potential availability of an anti-suit injunction was thought to provide a reason for choosing arbitration instead of judicial resolution. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:26 am
Eventually, the AG states that an anti-suit injunction cannot be qualified as a ground of non-recognition for a violation of public policy under article V (2)(b) NYC (paras 160 ff). [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:01 am
One of the columnists cited by White was Janice Turner, whose many negative articles about trans people (sample headlines: ‘Children Sacrificed to Appease Trans Lobby’ and ‘Trans Ideologists Are Spreading Cod Science’) have caused widespread fury in LGBT circles. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am
To determine whether a detainee’s constitutional rights have been violated by a jail or prison, the court applies the “legitimate penological purposes” test from Turner v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 12:06 pm
Clear coverage: Transunion v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:54 am
The Supreme Court will have to resolve this split and, in doing so, clarify the substance and bounds of editorial discretion as a doctrine. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am
Turner and Hooch - (1989) (Dog-Mastif) (Tom Hanks) 18. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 7:03 am
Baker v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
In Geduldig v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
E185.96.A730 1993 Regenstein Baldwin, Lewis V. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:38 am
The evidence, according to Lewis, will show that so far, Guantanamo force-feeding practices thoroughly violate legal standards set by the Turner v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 10:02 am
Frederic Whitehurst and Jane Turner, two FBI whistleblowers and members of the NWC's Board of Directors. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
It would also seem prudent (though hopefully redundant) for the advance notice bylaw to require that any material information disclosed to the corporation pursuant to the bylaw or director questionnaires also be disclosed to stockholders promptly as part of the proxy statement or pursuant to Rule 14a-12 as a pre-filing solicitation.[8] It appears that nominating stockholders sometimes do not consider themselves bound by Rule 14a-12 until well after the date when notice of a nomination is… [read post]
