Search for: "U. S. v. Bonds" Results 81 - 100 of 223
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2014, 5:00 am by Michael M. O'Hear
S. 438, 461 (2002); see Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Wolff, Cogency, Seriousness, Cohesion, and Importance: Assessing the Strasbourg Case-Law on Religion or Belief, (Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 2023, 00, 1–20).Douglas Mulliken, “It’s not just money; you are investing in your identity”: Israel, the Jewish Diaspora, and the Israel Bonds Program, (May 11, 2023).Dimitry Gegenava, Insults to Religious Feelings v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 3:03 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Rakoff, in a 15 page opinion, rejected the proposed agreement between Citigroup and the Securities and Exchange Commission to settle charges filed by the SEC against Citigroup accusing the company of "selling investors slices of a $1 billion mortgage-bond deal called Class V Funding III, without disclosing it was betting against $500 million of those assets. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 6:17 am by Moseley Collins
[U]nlike the defendants in Kennemur and Jones, and Bonds, defendants in this case had the opportunity to take Brown's deposition in light of his changed opinion and prepare for cross-examination and rebuttal of his testimony. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
” In an interview at PRI, Kevin Johnson discusses the court’s decision this week in Jennings v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 6:34 pm by Kurt R. Karst
Human Factors/Usability (HF/U) and Clinical Performance Testing The draft guidance offers general information about HF/U and clinical performance testing. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:53 am by Adam Feldman
In the Supreme Court’s first decision of the term, Hamer v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 8:03 pm by Carter Ruml
Clement Attlee, Nov. 1945 (Archives Canada via Wikimedia Commons) Its detractors might see the bill as a reprise of Wickard v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 9:17 am by Russell Knight
Specifically, orders of protection are for people who had an intimate bond with their abuser. [read post]