Search for: "U. S. v. Drew"
Results 81 - 100
of 180
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2017, 2:05 pm
S. 153 (1976); Baze v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:30 pm
” 15 U. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 9:08 am
First came Gorsuch’s opinion for a unanimous court in Henson v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 10:52 am
&id=GALE%7CA483862228&v=2.1&u=mnaumntwin&it=r&p=PROF&sw=w&authCou [read post]
22 May 2017, 8:21 am
Cromartie, 532 U. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am
” Thanks to Bryan U. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
In StorageCraft Technology v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 7:00 am
In 2015, Corwin v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 3:33 am
An earlier post on this blog, examining a post-trial decision in Matter of Digeser v Flach, 2015 NY Slip Op 51609(U) [Sup Ct Albany County Nov. 5, 2015], described the minority shareholder’s dissolution claim under Section 1104-a of the Business Corporation Law as a “classic case of minority shareholder oppression. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 2:00 am
Sanders v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 1:01 am
But some of that work was as a consultant to Thurgood Marshall in preparing the Supreme Court case Brown v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 10:52 am
Cohen v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:17 pm
Now, we have all done this research, and in the Southern District alone there is a case standing for the proposition for and against every conceivable amount of time you like as being too much delay, not enough delay, and ju-u-u-u-u-ust right. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm
This wide-ranging, expansive lecture drew on Chris’s recent, widely praised book, Making Money: Coin, Currency, and the Coming of Capitalism (Oxford, 2015). [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm
Consider, for example, Riggs v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
It was the dissents at the Fifth Circuit that raised the question of justiciability, first in Judge Higginson’s dissent when addressing the government’s request to stay the District Court’s ruling, and then by Judge King’s dissent (which drew on Judge Higginson’s work) when denying the government’s appeal of the District Court’s injunction. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:13 am
Appellants, who are residents of those districts, argue that the General Assembly drew the districts to meet or exceed a pre-determined fifty-five-percent threshold of black voting age residents without regard for each district’s unique geography, population, and political history. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court declined to rule on the merits in Zubik v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
Soccer Fed’n v. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 4:23 pm
The three trials are as follows: 5 April 2016, Umeyor v Ibe, 5 days; 18 April 2016, Undre v London Borough of Harrow, 2 days.; 23 May 2016, Theedom v Nourish Training, 3-4 days. [read post]
