Search for: "U. S. v. Kim"
Results 81 - 100
of 110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2012, 2:08 pm
The bill authorizes funding to train courts and police in assisting immigrant women who cooperate with law enforcement to receive T- and U-Visas. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
Kim, James. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:15 am
U. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 8:53 am
Stanford and Cheng got into Stanford's car and made a U-turn. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:36 am
Tomasovic, Brian S. and Stephen V. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
” Though many other definitions of the word exist, in light of the Supreme Court’s majority opinion in AT&T v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 6:46 am
Image by Getty Images via @daylifeIn Kim Kardashian v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:35 am
,S. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
The Times, for example, will attach an “Editor’s Note” to the web version of an article to allow the subject of the article a form of redress. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
64 U. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
U. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 9:56 pm
This has occurred in the U. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 3:00 pm
Schaefer Ambulance Service, Inc. (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 16, 29, 273 Cal.Rptr. 615 [noting exclusion of public employees from general minimum wage order]; see also Kim v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 11:00 am
UNITED STATES v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
Plaintiff commenced this personal injury action against the New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA), the vehicle's titled owner and lessor, the vehicle's driver, and the vehicle's registered owner, American Transit, Inc. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
Motz, to felony obstruction of justice charges and violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships related to concealing deliberate vessel pollution from the M/V Iorana, a Greek flagged cargo ship that made port calls in Baltimore, Tacoma, Wash., and New Orleans. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 7:31 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:40 am
CRIMES AND OFFENSES - ELEMENTS State v. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 7:12 am
* * * [Appellant] Forrester contends, and the court of appeals held, that the clerk's notation in the trial record that the clerk's office was "[u]nable to locate other items requested" affirmatively reveals that the trial court failed to notify Forrester of its intent to dismiss the case. [read post]
