Search for: "U. S. v. Lynch"
Results 81 - 100
of 118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2016, 11:28 am
(relisted after the October 7 and October 14 Conferences) Thanks to Bryan U. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 10:48 am
Louis Gossett Jr. is a U. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
The opinion cites Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
Lynch, 15-362. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 12:08 am
State v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm
United States 15-9260 Issues: Whether the Supreme Court’s decision in Pepper v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 10:39 am
Lynch, & R. [read post]
26 May 2020, 1:22 pm
Lynch, ___ N.C. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 9:49 am
Adam Kovacevich has dubbed this dynamic “The Prager Effect,” in honor of Prager U’s effort to censorially weaponize the PruneYard case that instead validated YouTube’s editorial rights. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 4:54 am
Here are some of our favorite cases addressing the partner/PINO dilemma: D’Esposito v Gusrae, Kaplan & Bruno PLLC, 44 AD 3d 512 (1st Dept 2007) (attorney who did not sign PLLC operating agreement but nonetheless received K-1s held not a partner); Barrison v D’Amato & Lynch LLP, 2019 NY Slip Op 30905(U) (Sup Ct NY County, April 2, 2019) (attorney who did not sign partnership agreement but received K-1s identifying him as a… [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 7:25 pm
Donnelly and Allegheny v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:13 am
But not all the sumrevs favored prosecutors: In three-time relist Lynch v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:01 am
Socialist Eugene V. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 2:43 am
Payner, 447 U. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”[15] The court found that Third Circuit precedents, Hays and Co v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:52 pm
” The Court has held [in Jones v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
”[26] In the Commission’s telling, “[a]s part of the settlement process, the Commission and a defendant negotiate terms,” and “if either party disagrees with terms t [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 10:52 am
Lynch to support her argument that deference to the views of the executive branch is inappropriate: “If [Gorsuch’s] criticism were to someday topple the Chevron deference doctrine, there would remain no constitutionally valid basis for the judiciary’s deferring to the executive’s views on matters of legal interpretation. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
