Search for: "U. S. v. State of Hawaii" Results 81 - 100 of 143
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2018, 11:18 am by Hilary Hurd, Yishai Schwartz
The challenge was brought by three U.S. nationals whose relatives are from affected countries; by the Muslim Association of Hawaii; and by the state of Hawaii in its capacity as operator of the University of Hawaii system, which recruits students and faculty from affected countries. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 6:51 pm by Bill Marler
The potentially affected FreshKampo and HEB products are past shelf life and no longer available for purchase in the United States. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 3:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Gundarev, 2009 NY Slip Op 51972 [U], * 1-* 2 [Crim Ct, Kings County 2009]; King Transp. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 7:25 pm
After getting a chance to actually read the majority and dissenting opinions in Cumo v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am by Josh Blackman
The “presumption of regularity” that attaches to all federal officials’ actions, United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
Hawaii (2018), which upheld Trump’s executive order banning entry of certain immigrants from majority Muslim nations. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 12:41 pm by Jim Gerl
Dept of Educ, State of Hawaii 58 IDELR 2 (9th Cir 12/27/11) Ninth Circuit held that the language of a settlement agreement prevented a private school from being the “as agreed” stay put placement. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at… [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 9:22 am by Jim Gerl
Dept of Educ, State of Hawaii 58 IDELR 2 (9th Cir 12/27/11) Ninth Circuit held that the language of a settlement agreement prevented a private school from being the “as agreed” stay put placement. [read post]