Search for: "U. S. v. Taylor"
Results 81 - 100
of 180
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2008, 8:24 am
For example, in Taylor v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 5:06 am
From Judge Dan Aaron Polster's decision Friday in Pesta v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
Leschinski v Bailey; 2012 NY Slip Op 30202(U); January 11, 2012 Supreme Court, Nassau County; Docket Number: 1934/10; Judge: R. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am
Lord & Taylor, LLC v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
U. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:27 am
Taylor, 529 U. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 3:24 pm
Troops, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 12:56 pm
Most of Russell’s paper concentrates on Simkins’ career at UT, as well as the 1954 decision (five weeks after Brown v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
”Citing Harlow v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
, Haney v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
" According to the original and superseding indictments filed in Manhattan federal court: The original indictment, United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
" According to the original and superseding indictments filed in Manhattan federal court: The original indictment, United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:04 am
”) (emphasis added); Taylor v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:04 am
”) (emphasis added); Taylor v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 9:25 am
In NTP, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 7:09 am
Continental v. [read post]
