Search for: "U.S. v. Chandler*"
Results 81 - 100
of 179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
Atkinson, 369 U.S. 527, 532, 82 S.Ct. 997, 8 L.Ed.2d 88 (1962); Breese v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:31 am
Bolden v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 2:16 pm
Bush (06-1195) and Al Odah v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
He's a veteran of such battles as Hexion v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:00 am
Gutchess 1998 Irrevocable Trust v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 2:53 pm
Marietta City Sch., 2021 U.S. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 11:58 am
U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:18 pm
” Under the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 4:01 am
” Briefly: Kimberly Robinson reports for Bloomberg Law on research showing that “[t]he female members of the U.S. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:50 pm
Joshua Ray, White-Collar Criminal Prosecutions in the U.S. and U.K. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 5:48 pm
Lightner, 319 U.S. 561 (1943). [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 2:19 pm
Jay Plager, Circuit Judge, U.S. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 1:05 pm
Mitchell v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
Cairns v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 3:50 pm
” -USA v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 10:15 am
” You can access today’s order of the U.S. [read post]
