Search for: "U.S. v. Core" Results 81 - 100 of 4,127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2014, 8:27 am by Unknown
A decision for a later day:Because we affirm on this narrower ground, we need not reach the argument, advanced by the government and Core Labs, that § 806 does not apply extraterritoriality.Villanueva v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 8:27 am by Michael Fox
A decision for a later day:Because we affirm on this narrower ground, we need not reach the argument, advanced by the government and Core Labs, that § 806 does not apply extraterritoriality.Villanueva v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:28 am by David Gans
While Brown is still widely celebrated as the “crown jewel of the U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 4:16 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
Based on that core holding, the Cunningham decision weighed in on multiple important, and often nuanced, PAGA issues, including reconciling the dissonant holdings in Franco v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 8:45 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Egyptian Goddess v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 6:47 am
  (Note:  The relevance of core and non-core claims is discussed in our Stern v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 6:47 am
  (Note:  The relevance of core and non-core claims is discussed in our Stern v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 3:38 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch The country is awaiting big non-patent cases from the U.S. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 6:46 pm
Nine specs were dismissed prior to the scheduled date of Colonel Murphy's Article 32 hearing (which Colonel Murphy subsequently waived).Interestingly, the Times article states that the larceny specs are unrelated to the licensure issues that formed the original core of the charges. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 1:24 pm
I won't comment much about the merits of the Ninth Circuit's decision this morning that invalidated (over a partial dissent) the core portions of Arizona's 2010 anti-immigration statutes as preempted by federal law. [read post]