Search for: "U.S. v. Mark" Results 81 - 100 of 11,261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2010, 1:20 pm by Phil
" According to the statute, "any person" may bring suit to recover the penalty for false marking, with the U.S. government receiving half the amount recovered in such a qui tam proceeding. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:34 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Parker, 348 U.S. 26 (1954) marks the legal genesis of modern public use jurisprudence. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:16 am by Woodrow Pollack
Thus, if you mark your widget as "patented" or covered by U.S. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 8:10 am by The Docket Navigator
After all, the government splits any award obtained with the relator.It appears, however, that the United States is finally acknowledging publicly that the trend of suits under 35 USC 292 has gone too far, given the rash of thinly pled false marking claims that have come to dominate the landscape since the Federal Circuit’s decision in Forest Group v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 1:23 pm by lennyesq
(thetakeaway.org) Events to mark 60 years since Topeka’s Brown v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:14 am
Yet, it was not until the Federal Circuit's decision in Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]