Search for: "U.S. v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company" Results 81 - 100 of 112
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2011, 9:48 am by Robert A Levy
It’s no accident that the costs of LASIK and cosmetic surgery, which are not covered by insurance, have declined while the cost of MRIs, which is covered by insurance, has skyrocketed. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 8:53 pm by Peter Vodola
District Court for the District of Minnesota, which held that PHL Variable Insurance Company ("Phoenix") did not need to return the premiums paid to Phoenix to procure life insurance on Lucille E. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 9:01 am by S2KM Limited
When the life insurance company stopped making payments after eight years, Mr. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 10:23 am
To make matters worse, a law suit brought against the ship's doctor in a U.S. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Medical Device: MEDICAL DEVICE SUPPLIER ISN'T 'HEALTH CARE PROVIDER', Orthopedic Res. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 7:39 am by Law Lady
DaimlerChrysler Corp., 30 No. 8 Westlaw Journal Automotive 1, Westlaw Journal Automotive October 12, 2010A Louisiana appeals court has affirmed a $5 million verdict to the family of a child taken off life support after being removed from his pregnant mother following an automobile accident that crushed her midsection. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am by stevemehta
The appeal court invoked the collateral source rule, which says damages shouldn’t be reduced simply because the victim receives benefits from other sources, such as insurance companies. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:09 am by Patrick Hindert
Hartford Life Insurance Company Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company Hartford Casualty Insurance Company Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest Hartford Fire Insurance Company Plus other parties including Hartford structured settlement attorneys, brokers and agents and any third parties acting on behalf of Hartford in the structured settlement transactions. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 11:23 am
The "ABC" test of the Vermont Statute Annotated, Title 21, Chapter 17 determines if the individual is an employee for unemployment insurance purposes. ** In order to determine whether an employer is required to provide unemployment insurance coverage to an individual, the department utilizes an employment "test". [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 5:08 pm by Law Lady
Weekly D809gTorts -- Automobile accident -- Rear end collision -- Accident occurring when motorcycle collided with rear end of defendant's automobile which stopped suddenly at an intersection where defendant had the right-of-way -- Presumption of negligence on part of driver of rear vehicle is not applicable in action by passenger of rear vehicle against driver of lead vehicle -- Issue is whether defendant was negligent as forward driver -- To the extent there exists evidence… [read post]