Search for: "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT v. CASTLE" Results 81 - 100 of 156
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2011, 7:46 am by Lewis Lazarus
The Texas plaintiffs initiated the Texas action notwithstanding that Malouf had agreed in each of the five agreements "to the exclusive jurisdiction of any state court within New Castle County, Delaware or, if it can obtain jurisdiction, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware sitting in Wilmington, Del. ... with respect to any claim or cause of action arising under or relating to th[e] agreement[s]. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
In other words, an identical act of infringement would yield two different damages awards simply because the infringers packaged their products in different units. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:37 am by Amy Howe
” Representing the United States, Assistant to the U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 6:20 am
This post examines an opinion from the California Court of Appeal – Fourth District:  In re M.H., 2016 WL 3541185 (2016). [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 7:29 am by skelly
Equitas Insurance Limited (EIL), No. 17-CV-6850-LTS-SLC, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, ICSOP issued an umbrella liability insurance policy to Castle & Cook, Inc. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
In that case, Jackson Women’s Health Organization v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
It simply referred to a line of prior cases that had squarely rejected the legal theory and deferred to them (as lower courts are bound to do).On appeal, however, the Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund, one of the premier advocacy groups for LGBT rights in the United States took over her case. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm by Marie Louise
Allegiance Corporation (TTABlog) Another restaurant name dispute – District Court S D New York: Nothing Heavy, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am by INFORRM
United States As mentioned above, the US Senate has voted in favour of legislation that could ban TikTok in the country if its Chinese owners refuse to sell. [read post]